Skip to Content

How academic-policy engagement has developed

Our timeline shows the development of academic-policy engagement and the growth of interest in using evidence to support public policy over the last 25 years.

About the timeline

Highlighted items are milestones we think are crucial in the development of where we are today.

Filter by

Funding call of £11.5m announced for AI-driven evidence synthesis for policy making

More info:
Funding opportunity: Transforming global evidence: AI-driven evidence synthesis for policymaking
Organisation:

Economic and Social Research Council

Significance:
Major investment in synthesis for policy, launched at same time as Wellcome Trust’s Evidence Synthesis Collaborative £14.5m for new data and tools for ‘living synthesis’.

Launch of Behavioural Research UK, a research consortium which serves as a leadership hub to build national capability for behavioural research.

More info:
Behavioural Research UK website
Organisation:

University of Edinburgh, Economic and Social Research Council

Significance:
Major investment with academia, government and business for policy insights from across all of UK.

Publication of “The Responsible Knowledge Exchange, Engagement, Impact (RKEEI) Framework”

More info:
The Responsible Knowledge Exchange, Engagement and Impact (RKEEI) Framework
Organisation:

University of Oxford

Significance:
Practical tool focus on public engagement – but also relevant to policy – designed by researchers leading the REF 2029 Research Diversity Advisory Panel.

Guidance published by the Government Office for Science on writing and using Areas of Research Interest

More info:
Writing and using Areas of Research Interest
Organisation:

Government Office for Science

Significance:
Aimed at departmental officials but useful insight for anybody wanting to learn about the process of developing ARIs.

Publication of report “Use of evaluation and modelling in government”

More info:
Use of evaluation and modelling in government
Organisation:

Public Accounts Committee, House of Commons

Significance:
Influential Parliamentary select committee encouraged HM Treasury to ask departments to explain why they do not plan to publish some evaluations

First Knowledge Exchange Framework (KEF)

More info:
Knowledge Exchange Framework
Organisation:

Research England

Significance:
The first iteration of the Framework was launched to provide comparable, benchmarked and publicly available performance information, including working with the ‘public and third sector[s]’. Dashboards to provide more information on universities role in economy and society

Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2021

More info:
REF 2021
Organisation:

Research England

Significance:
New round of assessment of research quality to inform funding decisions. Wide range of policy impact case studies in 2021 and increases of impact to 25% of allocations.

Creation of the Evaluation Task Force, Cabinet Office

More info:
Evaluation task force
Organisation:

Cabinet Office

Significance:
Launch of a joint HM Treasury and Cabinet Office body to promote evaluation in government via advice, support, scrutiny, and challenge. Also runs the What Works Network and Evaluation Accelerator Fund. Attempt to champion evaluation and evidence at the heart of decision-making.

Creation of the Government Analysis Function

More info:
Government Analysis Function
Organisation:

Cross-departmental, Civil Service, UK Government

Significance:
The Government Analysis Function is a network for all civil servants working in government analysis.

Creation of Administrative Data Research UK

More info:
Administrative Data Research UK
Organisation:

Administrative Data Research UK (ADR UK), Economic and Social Research Council

Significance:
Launch of a partnership to help researchers access the UK’s public sector data, to enable better informed policy decisions. Replaced Administrative Data Research Network. ESRC-funded body bringing together data held by different parts of government, and facilitating access for accredited researchers.

Creation of the Knowledge Exchange Unit, UK Parliament

More info:
Knowledge Exchange Unit
Organisation:

UK Parliament

Significance:
Launch of the Knowledge Exchange Unit, UK Parliament. Launch of unit in Westminster to foster exchange of information and expertise between researchers and the UK Parliament. First port of call for academics seeking to engage with Westminster and the dedicated body to broker university and other research inside Parliament, funded by ESRC

Creation of Evaluation and Trial Advice Panel (ETAP)

More info:
Evaluation and Trial Advice Panel
Organisation:

Evaluation and Trial Advice Panel, Cabinet Office, UK Government

Significance:
ETAP brings together top evaluation and experimentation experts from across the UK to provide free evaluation advice to civil servants and What Works Centres.

Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2014

More info:
REF 2014
Organisation:

Research England

Significance:
The Research Excellence Framework is the national assessment of the strength of UK research and replaced the previous Research Assessment Exercise (RAE). It included impact case studies for the first time.

Creation of think tank UK in a Changing Europe

More info:
UK in a Changing Europe
Organisation:

UK in a Changing Europe, hosted by Kings College London

Significance:
Cross-UK project to bring social science research and expertise to bear in the debates on EU referendum. An academic think-tank to make social science more accessible that has continued to play a role post-Brexit.

Creation of the Scottish Universities Insight Institute

More info:
Scottish Insight
Organisation:

Scottish Universities

Significance:
A Scotland-wide initiative of knowledge exchange Programmes were designed to stimulate in-depth knowledge exchange and mobilisation through workshops, seminars, and other activities over a period of several months. Joint venture of research-intensive Scottish universities for the wider public good, closed in 2024.

Launch of the Scottish Parliament Academic Network (SPAN)

More info:
Scottish Parliament Academic Network
Organisation:

Scottish Parliament

Significance:
Launched by the Scottish Parliament, it formalises and coordinates knowledge exchange via a network of knowledge exchange/brokering professionals throughout Scottish and other universities.

Launch of the Local Government Knowledge Navigator

More info:
Institute for Government review of the Local Government Knowledge Navigator
Organisation:

Local Government Knowledge Navigator

Significance:
Initiative launched to enable local government to connect with research using evidence reviews, events, and an online searchable register. An attempt to grow connections between research and local government. Ran from 2013-2016.

What works network reviews of UK Government departmental use of evidence

More info:
See, for example, What works review Department for International Development
Organisation:

What Works Network, Cabinet Office, UK Government

Significance:
Significance: attempt to incentivise research use by published audits and reviews

Research Excellence Framework response to pilot

More info:
Decisions on assessing research impact
Organisation:

Research England

Significance:
After a pilot project, it was announced that the national appraisal of university research (and thus distribution of core research funding) will reward impact with 20% of overall scores to institutions. Major funding incentive for policy impact on the basis of impact case studies.

New requirement of “Pathways to Impact” in grant applications

Organisation:

UKRI

Significance:
UKRI required grant applications to describe their potential impact in response to the 2006 Warry report. Relevant research funding proposals had to map out future policy impacts.

Publication of the Warry Report; “Increasing the Economic Impact of Research Councils”

More info:
Increasing the Economic Impact of Research Councils
Organisation:

Independent

Significance:
A report for the government on increasing Research Council knowledge exchange. Focus on economic benefits but also recommended a range of measures to boost policy including incentives for academics, and increased interchange of people and ideas.

Publication of report “Scientific Advice, Risk and Evidence Based Policy Making”

More info:
Scientific Advice, Risk and Evidence Based Policy Making
Organisation:

Science and Technology Committee, House of Commons, UK Parliament

Significance:
Report by House of Commons Science and Technology Committee setting out recommendations for better scientific advice and ways to improve the way it communicates levels of risk to the public. Urged the government to use more learned societies and professional bodies in science advice, give more power to science advisers

Publication of the Civil Service Competency Framework

More info:
Civil service competency framework
Organisation:

UK Government

Significance:
A competency framework that outlined the skills and behaviours expected of civil servants. Launched by Prime Minister, the policy profession was expected to have core competency of ‘analysis and use of evidence’

Publication of the Code of Practice for Scientific Advisory Committees

More info:
Code of practice for scientific advisory committees and councils
Significance:
Guidance published on management and conduct of independent government advisory science committees and councils that builds on the ‘May Guidelines’ published in March 1997 by Sir Robert May, then Chief Scientific Adviser. Key guide for how academics in formal advisory bodies can provide impartial advice to policymakers.

Delivery of lecture “Influence or Irrelevance: can social science improve government?” by David Blunkett

More info:
Influence or irrelevance: can social science inform government
Significance:
Economic and Social Research Council Lecture by Education Secretary, David Blunkett. Provocation that invited the research community to accept an enhanced role in the policy-making process.

Launch of UK Network of Evidence Based Policy and Practice

Organisation:

Queen Mary University

Significance:
Launch of a network of centres around the UK funded with a coordinating centre at Queen Mary, University of London. Developed knowledge, careers, methods and leadership in evidence for policy and practice

Publication of report “Adding it up: improving analysis & modelling in central government”

More info:
Adding it up: improving analysis & modelling in central government
Organisation:

Performance and Innovation, Cabinet Office, UK Government

Significance:
Report by Cabinet Office Performance and Innovation Unit setting out how to grow analytical capacity in government. Influential report with foreword by the Prime Minister promoting training on research and analysis for civil servants and ministers

Publication of white paper “Modernising government” and cabinet office report “Professional policymaking for the 21st Century”

More info:
Modernising governmentand Professional policymaking for the 21st Century
Organisation:

Cabinet Office, UK Government

Significance:
Reports published by the Cabinet Office stated that the government should be ‘shaped’ by evidence and ‘what works’. Language and commitment by the Labour government to using ‘best available evidence from a wide range of sources’ for modernisation agenda.

Launch of the arms-length body National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)

More info:
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Organisation:

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)

Significance:
An arms-length body using research and expertise on clinical and cost effectiveness of health interventions. Highly influential evidence-based body in health policy that inspired other ‘what works centres’

Launch of the Centre for Management and Policy Studies

More info:
Institute for Government report: Reforming the Civil Service: The Centre for Management and Policy Studies
Organisation:

Cabinet Office, UK Government

Significance:
Launch of a cross-government body providing training, consultancy, research, and ‘knowledge pools’ and a ‘policy hub’ for information sharing to benefit policy making. Promoted evidence-based policy and practice from the centre of government. Ran from 1999-2005.

Additional information around the eco-system

    • Events and milestones that are national in scale.
    • Government bodies if they work across the UK and policy fields.
    • Influential policies including White Papers, government strategy documents, select committee inquiries, Ministerial speeches, government guidance, independent reviews, and public reports on the sector.
    • Cross-cutting governmental organisation. This might include a body based in a single department as long as it works across Government.
    • Academic journals or thought-leadership reports
    • single sector/department/locality unless wider significance (e.g. exclusion of individual What Works Centre – but launch of group of centres is included)
    • Sub-national bodies (e.g. exclusion of Insights North East, Y-PERN)
    • Academic journal articles – even if highly influential
    • Precedes 1999
    • ADR-UK. (n.d.). About ADR UK. Retrieved 4 July 2024, from https://www.adruk.org/about-us/about-adr-uk/
    • Bailey, J., & Lloyd, P. (2016, June 25). The introduction of design to policymaking: Policy Lab and the UK government. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2016.314
    • Boswell, C., Smith, K., & Davies, C. (2022). Rethinking policy impact; Promoting Ethical and Effective Policy Engagement in the Higher Education Sector. https://rse.org.uk/programme/policy-advice/projects/rethinking-policy-impact/
    • Breckon, J. (2024, July 12). How to grow universities’ policy engagement functions. Wonkhe. https://wonkhe.com/blogs/how-to-grow-universities-policy-engagement-functions/
    • Cabinet Office. (2014, August 5). What Works Review of the Use of Evidence in the Department for International Development. GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/what-works-review-of-the-use-of-evidence-in-the-department-for-international-development–2
    • Cabinet Office. (2018). The What Works Network: Five Years On. GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-what-works-network-five-years-on
    • Campbell Collaboration. (n.d.). History of the Campbell Collaboration. Campbell Collaboration. Retrieved 4 July 2024, from https://www.campbellcollaboration.org/about-campbell/history.html
    • Capabilities in Academic Policy Engagement. (2020, June 15). £3.9m awarded to national collaboration to support academic engagement with public policy—CAPE. https://www.cape.ac.uk/2020/06/15/cape-launch-announcement/
    • CAPE. (2024). Building a National Agenda for Regional Academic-Policy Engagement. https://www.cape.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Building-a-national-agenda-for-regional-academic-policy-engagement-Feb-24.pdf
    • Davies, R. (2022, November 11). Enter the dragon: Senedd committees Areas of Research Interest pilot project – CAPE. https://www.cape.ac.uk/2022/11/11/senedd-aris/
    • de Campos, A. L. (2010). A Study on Methodologies for Research Impact Assessment: Responses of the UK Research Councils to the Warry Report. Industry and Higher Education, 24(5), 393–397. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2010.0006
    • ESRC. (2023, November 9). ESRC to radically expand UK behavioural research capacity. https://www.ukri.org/news/esrc-to-radically-expand-uk-behavioural-research-capacity/
    • Evaluation Task Force. (n.d.). About us. GOV.UK. Retrieved 4 July 2024, from https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/evaluation-task-force/about
    • Ford, C. J., & Mason, K. (2018). The Open Innovation Team: An Independent Evaluation of a Cabinet Office Initiative [Report]. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/149180/
    • Geyer, J. (2019). Reflections on the What Works Scotland initiative | What Works Scotland. Scottish Government. http://whatworksscotland.ac.uk/publications/reflections-on-the-what-works-scotland-initiative/
    • Government Office for Science. (2019). A review of Government Science Capability: Progress update (9 January 2024). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-science-capability-review/a-review-of-government-science-capability-progress-update-9-january-2024
    • Government Office for Science. (2020). Guidance for government Chief Scientific Advisers and their Officials Chief Scientific Advisers and their officials: An introduction. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5e145810ed915d06f75e5e41/chief-scientific-advisers-and-their-officials-an-introduction.pdf
    • Government Office for Science. (2023, September 12). New one-stop shop to find the topics government is interested in researching. GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-one-stop-shop-to-find-the-topics-government-is-interested-in-researching
    • Green, D., Bryant, V., Edwards, S., Kemp, C., McKenzie, M., Shah, S., & Soulsby, I. (2023). Then there were seven: A commentary on creating a public involvement strategy group for a policy research unit in behavioural science. Research Involvement and Engagement, 9(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-023-00413-w
    • Haddon, C., & Sasse, T. (2018). How government can work with academia. Institute for Government. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publications/how-government-can-work-academia
    • Halpern, D. (2015). Inside the Nudge Unit: How small changes can make a big difference. WH Allen.
    • Halpern, D. (2017, February 21). Transparency and evidence – show your workings – Civil Service Quarterly. https://quarterly.blog.gov.uk/2017/02/21/transparency-and-evidence-show-your-workings/
    • Hampshaw, S., Morling, J., & Black, M. (2023). Investing in research infrastructure to address health inequalities: Learning by doing. Public Health in Practice, 7, 100460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhip.2023.100460
    • HM Government. (2012). Civil Service reform plan. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/civil-service-reform-plan
    • Hodgkin, R., & Kelsey, T. (2024). Putting analysis and assessment at the heart of government. Institute for Government. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/analysis-assessment-heart-of-government
    • Hodgkinson, P. (2000). ‘Who Wants to be a Social Engineer? A commentary on David Blunkett’s Speech to the ESRC’. Sociological Research Online, 5(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.433
    • House of Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee. (2024). Transforming the UK’s Evidence Base; Fifth Report of Session 2023–24 (HC 197). https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5804/cmselect/cmpubadm/197/summary.html
    • House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. (2007). Scientific Advice, Risk and Evidence Based Policy Making: Government Response to the Committee’s Seventh Report of Session 2005–06 (HC 307).
    • IDOX. (2015, January 7). Local government knowledge navigator. The Knowledge Exchange Blog. https://theknowledgeexchangeblog.wordpress.com/tag/local-government-knowledge-navigator/
    • Institute for Government. (2018). How government can work with academia. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/report/how-government-can-work-academia
    • Institute for Government. (2020, March 31). Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies (SAGE). Institute for Government. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/article/explainer/scientific-advisory-group-emergencies-sage
    • Manville, C., Morgan Jones, M., Frearson, M., Castle-Clarke, S., Henham, M.-L., Gunashekar, S., & Grant, J. (2015). Preparing impact submissions for REF 2014: An evaluation: Findings and observations. RAND Europe Report. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR727.html
    • Martin, S. (2023). ‘Pulling rather than pushing’: A demand-led approach to evidence mobilisation. In The What Works Centres (pp. 100–112). Policy Press. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781447365112-013/html?lang=en
    • Menon, A., & Rutter, J. (2022, August 18). UK in a Changing Europe: Injecting social science into a polarised political debate. Impact of Social Sciences. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2022/08/18/uk-in-a-changing-europe-injecting-social-science-into-a-polarised-political-debate/
    • National Audit Office. (2013). Evaluation in Government—National Audit Office (NAO) Report. https://www.nao.org.uk/report/evaluation-government/
    • National Audit Office. (2003, April 16). Getting the Evidence: Using Research in Policy Making – NAO report. National Audit Office (NAO). https://www.nao.org.uk/reports/getting-the-evidence-using-research-in-policy-making/
    • Nesta. (n.d.). Alliance for Useful Evidence. Nesta. Retrieved 4 July 2024, from https://www.nesta.org.uk/project/alliance-useful-evidence/
    • Nurse, P. (2015). Ensuring a successful UK research endeavour; A Review of the UK Research Councils by Paul Nurse. Department for Business, Innovation & Skills. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nurse-review-of-research-councils-recommendations
    • Oancea, A. (2023, May 3). What is Responsible Knowledge Exchange, Engagement and Impact? Impact of Social Sciences. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2023/05/03/what-is-responsible-knowledge-exchange-engagement-and-impact/
    • Oliver, K., & Boaz, A. (2019). Transforming evidence for policy and practice: Creating space for new conversations. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0266-1
    • Oliver, K., & Boaz, A. (2020, November 27). Building new bridges between research and policy during a national lockdown. Impact of Social Sciences. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2020/11/27/building-new-bridges-between-research-and-policy-during-a-national-lockdown/
    • Oliver, K., Boaz, A., & Cuccato, G. (2022). Areas of research interest: Joining the dots between government and research at last? (11:1509). F1000Research. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.127542.1
    • Parliament. (n.d.). Knowledge Exchange Unit. Retrieved 4 July 2024, from https://www.parliament.uk/get-involved/research-impact-at-the-uk-parliament/knowledge-exchange-at-uk-parliament/
    • Parliamentary Office for Science and Technology. (n.d.). Areas of Research Interest. POST. Retrieved 4 July 2024, from https://post.parliament.uk/areas-of-research-interest/
    • Parsons, W. (2002). From Muddling Through to Muddling Up—Evidence Based Policy Making and the Modernisation of British Government. Public Policy and Administration, 17(3), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/095207670201700304
    • Pearson, H. (2024). Scientists are building giant ‘evidence banks’ to create policies that actually work. Nature, 634(8032), 16–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-03100-2
    • Policy Profession. (2024, April 12). Policy profession standards. GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/policy-profession-standards
    • Public Accounts Committee. (2022). Use of evaluation and modelling in government. Fourth Report. HC 254. House of Commons. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5803/cmselect/cmpubacc/254/summary.html
    • Public Administration Select Committee. (2007). Skills for Government Ninth Report of Session 2006–07. https://committees.parliament.uk/work/4405/civil-service-skills-inquiry/
    • Puttick, R. (2013). Why we need to create a ‘NICE for social policy’. Nesta: Alliance for Useful Evidence. https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/why-we-need-to-create-a-nice-for-social-policy/
    • Puttick, R., & Mulgan, G. (2013). What should the ‘What Works Network’ do? Nesta. https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/what-should-the-what-works-network-do/
    • Scottish Parliament. (n.d.). Scottish Parliament Academic Network. Retrieved 4 July 2024, from https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/research-prepared-for-parliament/academic-engagement/how-to-engage/scottish-parliament-academic-network
    • Sealey, B. (2022). UPEN Phase II: Final Report—Scoping Business Models for UPEN’s Sustainability. Universities Policy Engagement Network.
    • Senedd. (n.d.). Areas of Research Interest. Retrieved 4 July 2024, from https://senedd.wales/senedd-business/areas-of-research-interest/
    • Stevenson, C., Grant, J., Szomszor, M., Ang, C., Kapoor, D., Gunashekar, S., & Guthrie, S. (2023). Data enhancement and analysis of the REF 2021 Impact Case Studies. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2162-1.html
    • Technopolis. (2023). Strategic Priorities Fund (SPF) Interim Impact Evaluation – Main report. https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/UKRI-04082023-Strategic-Priorities-Fund-interim-impact-evaluation-main-findings-report.pdf
    • UK Covid 19 Inquiry. (2024). Module 1 report: The resilience and preparedness of the United Kingdom; A report by The Rt Hon the Baroness Hallett DBE Chair of the UK Covid-19 Inquiry. https://covid19.public-inquiry.uk/reports/module-1-report-the-resilience-and-preparedness-of-the-united-kingdom/
    • UK higher education funding bodies. (2011). Decisions on assessing research impact 2011-01. https://2014.ref.ac.uk/pubs/2011-01/index.html
    • UKRI. (n.d.). UKRI impact acceleration accounts. Retrieved 4 July 2024, from https://www.ukri.org/what-we-do/browse-our-areas-of-investment-and-support/ukri-impact-acceleration-accounts/
    • UKRI. (2020, December 2). ESRC-funded observatories will help tackle impacts of COVID-19. https://www.ukri.org/news/esrc-funded-observatories-will-help-tackle-impacts-of-covid-19/
    • UKRI. (2023, February 21). UKRI policy fellowships 2023. https://www.ukri.org/opportunity/ukri-policy-fellowships-2023/
    • University Policy Engagement Network. (2021). Surfacing Equity, Diversity and Inclusion within Academic-Policy Engagement. https://www.upen.ac.uk/news/latest_news/?action=story&id=251
    • Wilsdon, J. (2020, January 27). A requiem for impact? Wonkhe. https://wonkhe.com/blogs/a-requiem-for-impact/

The academic-policy ecosystem

Find out more

Submit an item to the timeline

Have a suggestion for something you think should be included in the timeline? Submit it through our form.

UPEN will review suggestions periodically, and this timeline will be updated annually.

    *Required