We are interested in proposals that address one or more of the following areas:
How trust in evidence works, e.g.
- Evidence appraisal and assessing different types of evidence
- Engaging with diverse research methodologies, disciplines, and knowledges
- Navigating tensions between research rigour and policy needs
Trust in evidence under pressure, e.g.
- Standards of trust in evidence in times of crisis or high-pressured situations
- Managing uncertainty, ambiguity, or incomplete evidence
- The role of knowledge mobilisers in countering assumption, misinformation, and disinformation
Building trust in practice, e.g.
- Use of narratives and stories
- Relational and long-term engagement practices
- Co-productional and collaborative approaches
Democratic accountability for evidence use in policymaking, e.g.
- Place-sensitive policymaking and local legitimacy
- Public trust in expertise, experts, and institutions
- Engaging communities and citizens in evidence-informed decision-making
Session proposals on other topics linked to the conference theme of trust in evidence in academic-policy engagement are welcome.