Report: A review of ‘Areas of Research Interest’ (ARIs) as a mechanism for research-policy engagement 

The University of Leeds, alongside UPEN and the Centre for Science and Policy, has published a new review of the existing evidence base evaluating ARIs. 

Since their introduction to the policy space, ARIs have emerged as a promising mechanism for strengthening engagement between researchers and policymakers. They help public bodies articulate their evidence needs, broaden participation in research-policy engagement and enhance the visibility and relevance of academic expertise. 

Structural limitations have constrained the spread of ARI systems, with uneven usage across different levels of government and limited mechanisms to coordinate shared evidence needs. This fragmentation increases duplication and creates a more complex system for researchers to navigate, with policymakers missing out on opportunities to collaborate.  

This is compounded by poor alignment between key ARI partners and a lack of dedicated funding and capacity. Policymakers can also lack the time, resource and capability to translate the research they receive into insight. For researchers, ARIs can be frustrating, with a lack of feedback and communication throughout the process. This makes it difficult to find out how submissions are considered or whether their contributions have led to any tangible impact. 

The review has identified key recommendations to help build a more resilient and connected ecosystem, including: 

• Extending the UK ARI database to encompass areas of research interest questions across all tiers of government and public bodies. 

• Greater support for ARIs through strategic and resilient funding from universities, higher education funders, and public authorities. 

• Embedding better communication, monitoring and evaluation mechanisms to build confidence and engagement with ARIs.  

Read the review online now to learn more about the evidence on ARIs.